OutYet.ai

Benchmarks

Compare AI models

Pick two models to see release dates, benchmark scores, and community ratings side by side.

Frontier benchmarks

Frontier board

6 releases. Five ways to compare.

Selected for recent releases and benchmark coverage, not a single overall rank. Each column sorts the same models by its own score. No reading means no bar.

○ Independent evaluation · ◆ Vendor or self-reported, labeled per reading.

Coding

BenchLM · 0 to 100

  1. Claude Opus 5.582.82Independent

    Anthropic

  2. Claude Fable 5.176.58Independent

    Anthropic

  3. GPT-6 Astra74.83Independent

    OpenAI

  4. Gemini 4 Argon72.24Independent

    Google DeepMind

  5. GPT-6.1 Sol70.39Independent

    OpenAI

  6. Gemini 3.8 Flash60.02Independent

    Google DeepMind

Agentic

BenchLM · 0 to 100

  1. Claude Opus 5.589.3Independent

    Anthropic

  2. Claude Fable 5.180.15Independent

    Anthropic

  3. Gemini 4 Argon77.66Independent

    Google DeepMind

  4. GPT-6.1 Sol75.84Independent

    OpenAI

  5. GPT-6 Astra73.33Independent

    OpenAI

  6. Gemini 3.8 Flash64.26Independent

    Google DeepMind

Reasoning

BenchLM · 0 to 100

  1. GPT-6 Astra91.6Independent

    OpenAI

  2. GPT-6.1 Sol88.8Independent

    OpenAI

  3. Gemini 4 Argon85.2Independent

    Google DeepMind

  4. Claude Opus 5.584.4Independent

    Anthropic

  5. Claude Fable 5.183.5Independent

    Anthropic

  6. Gemini 3.8 Flash72.6Independent

    Google DeepMind

Knowledge

BenchLM · 0 to 100

  1. Claude Opus 5.589.36Independent

    Anthropic

  2. GPT-6.1 Sol85.95Independent

    OpenAI

  3. Claude Fable 5.185.85Independent

    Anthropic

  4. GPT-6 Astra85.51Independent

    OpenAI

  5. Gemini 4 Argon80.55Independent

    Google DeepMind

  6. Gemini 3.8 Flash69.8Independent

    Google DeepMind

Arena

LM Arena · Elo

  1. Gemini 4 Argon1,517.17Independent

    Google DeepMind

  2. Claude Opus 5.51,508.73Independent

    Anthropic

  3. Claude Fable 5.11,503.19Independent

    Anthropic

  4. Gemini 3.8 Flash1,495.7Independent

    Google DeepMind

  5. GPT-6.1 Sol1,479.94Independent

    OpenAI

  6. GPT-6 Astra1,476.48Independent

    OpenAI

Score links open the source; hover for capture details. Bar lengths start at zero. Arena lengths use the full public board maximum.

The shape of the scores

First three featured models. Toggle a name to isolate a line. Missing readings leave gaps, not zeroes.

CodingAgenticReasoningKnowledgeArena050100Claude Opus 5.5, Coding: 82.82. Independent. Captured 2026-11-07.Claude Opus 5.5, Agentic: 89.3. Independent. Captured 2026-11-07.Claude Opus 5.5, Reasoning: 84.4. Independent. Captured 2026-11-07.Claude Opus 5.5, Knowledge: 89.36. Independent. Captured 2026-11-07.Claude Opus 5.5, Arena: 1,508.73. Independent. Captured 2026-10-26.Claude Fable 5.1, Coding: 76.58. Independent. Captured 2026-11-07.Claude Fable 5.1, Agentic: 80.15. Independent. Captured 2026-11-07.Claude Fable 5.1, Reasoning: 83.5. Independent. Captured 2026-11-07.Claude Fable 5.1, Knowledge: 85.85. Independent. Captured 2026-11-07.Claude Fable 5.1, Arena: 1,503.19. Independent. Captured 2026-10-26.GPT-6 Astra, Coding: 74.83. Independent. Captured 2026-11-07.GPT-6 Astra, Agentic: 73.33. Independent. Captured 2026-11-07.GPT-6 Astra, Reasoning: 91.6. Independent. Captured 2026-11-07.GPT-6 Astra, Knowledge: 85.51. Independent. Captured 2026-11-07.GPT-6 Astra, Arena: 1,476.48. Independent. Captured 2026-10-26.

3 of 3 series shown.

Axes share drawing space, not meaning. Arena is Elo divided by the current board maximum; it is not a percentage accuracy.

The newest arrival

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Released 2026-10-21 · At least two readings

No predecessor is linked in the catalog yet. We do not infer a generation jump from a name.

Latest release with linked lineage

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5

Coding
+5.1pts
71.48 to 76.58 Independent2026-11-07 / 2026-11-07
Agentic
+6.03pts
74.12 to 80.15 Independent2026-11-07 / 2026-11-07
Knowledge
+4.18pts
81.67 to 85.85 Independent2026-11-07 / 2026-11-07
Arena
-0.09Elo
1,503.28 to 1,503.19 Independent2026-10-26 / 2026-10-26

Latest snapshots, not a controlled before-and-after trial. Capture dates and evaluation setups may differ.

Scores and sources

Frontier board: original scores. Not reported is missing, not zero.
ModelMetricScore / provenanceCapturedSource label / votes
Claude Opus 5.5CodingBenchLM.ai82.82Independent2026-11-07Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Fable 5.1CodingBenchLM.ai76.58Independent2026-11-07Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 AstraCodingBenchLM.ai74.83Independent2026-11-07GPT-6 Astra
Gemini 4 ArgonCodingBenchLM.ai72.24Independent2026-11-07Gemini 4 Argon
GPT-6.1 SolCodingBenchLM.ai70.39Independent2026-11-07GPT-6.1 Sol
Gemini 3.8 FlashCodingBenchLM.ai60.02Independent2026-11-07Gemini 3.8 Flash
Claude Opus 5.5AgenticBenchLM.ai89.3Independent2026-11-07Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Fable 5.1AgenticBenchLM.ai80.15Independent2026-11-07Claude Fable 5.1
Gemini 4 ArgonAgenticBenchLM.ai77.66Independent2026-11-07Gemini 4 Argon
GPT-6.1 SolAgenticBenchLM.ai75.84Independent2026-11-07GPT-6.1 Sol
GPT-6 AstraAgenticBenchLM.ai73.33Independent2026-11-07GPT-6 Astra
Gemini 3.8 FlashAgenticBenchLM.ai64.26Independent2026-11-07Gemini 3.8 Flash
GPT-6 AstraReasoningBenchLM.ai91.6Independent2026-11-07GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6.1 SolReasoningBenchLM.ai88.8Independent2026-11-07GPT-6.1 Sol
Gemini 4 ArgonReasoningBenchLM.ai85.2Independent2026-11-07Gemini 4 Argon
Claude Opus 5.5ReasoningBenchLM.ai84.4Independent2026-11-07Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Fable 5.1ReasoningBenchLM.ai83.5Independent2026-11-07Claude Fable 5.1
Gemini 3.8 FlashReasoningBenchLM.ai72.6Independent2026-11-07Gemini 3.8 Flash
Claude Opus 5.5KnowledgeBenchLM.ai89.36Independent2026-11-07Claude Opus 5.5
GPT-6.1 SolKnowledgeBenchLM.ai85.95Independent2026-11-07GPT-6.1 Sol
Claude Fable 5.1KnowledgeBenchLM.ai85.85Independent2026-11-07Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 AstraKnowledgeBenchLM.ai85.51Independent2026-11-07GPT-6 Astra
Gemini 4 ArgonKnowledgeBenchLM.ai80.55Independent2026-11-07Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 3.8 FlashKnowledgeBenchLM.ai69.8Independent2026-11-07Gemini 3.8 Flash
Gemini 4 ArgonArenaLM Arena1,517.17Independent2026-10-26Gemini 4 Argon (High)10,083 votes
Claude Opus 5.5ArenaLM Arena1,508.73Independent2026-10-26Claude Opus 5.5 (High)10,322 votes
Claude Fable 5.1ArenaLM Arena1,503.19Independent2026-10-26Claude Fable 5.1 (Max)16,343 votes
Gemini 3.8 FlashArenaLM Arena1,495.7Independent2026-10-26Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)43,997 votes
GPT-6.1 SolArenaLM Arena1,479.94Independent2026-10-26GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)8,305 votes
GPT-6 AstraArenaLM Arena1,476.48Independent2026-10-26GPT-6 Astra (Max)14,076 votes
Additional readings for these models. Separate benchmarks, not substitutes for the five chart axes.
ModelMetric / sourceScore / provenanceCaptured
Claude Opus 5.5MultimodalGroundedBenchLM.ai91.6Independent2026-11-07
Claude Opus 5.5GDP.pdfEpoch AI30.6Independent2026-11-07
Claude Fable 5.1Humanity's Last ExamEpoch AI46.5Independent2026-11-07
Claude Fable 5.1GDP.pdfEpoch AI29.6Independent2026-11-07
GPT-6 AstraHumanity's Last ExamEpoch AI54.8Independent2026-11-07
Gemini 4 ArgonGDP.pdfEpoch AI28.4Independent2026-11-07
Gemini 3.8 FlashMultimodalGroundedBenchLM.ai88Independent2026-11-07
Gemini 3.8 FlashHumanity's Last ExamEpoch AI44.5Independent2026-11-07
Gemini 3.8 FlashGDP.pdfEpoch AI23.4Independent2026-11-07
Open page →
Provider
Anthropic
-
Out yet?
Yes
-
Status
Available
-
Release date
Jul 1, 2026
-
ExploitBench?Epoch AI's ExploitBench: discovering and exploiting software vulnerabilities in controlled environments. Score is the percentage of tasks solved.Epoch AI
70.6Verify at Epoch AINov 7, 2026
-
Vibe rating?OutYet's community rating: signed-in users score the model 1–10. Shown as the average and the number of votes.
10.0 / 10 · 1
-
Predecessor
-
-
Successor
-
-

Benchmark scores are mirrored from third-party sources and captured on the dates shown. Numbers from different benchmarks, sources, or capture dates are not directly comparable.

Data from Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub” (CC BY 4.0).